Let’s compare Pika AI and Runway Gen 2 for AI animation.
Initially, I uploaded a ballet dancer image for animation. Pika AI’s result was not impressive, lacking motion. Runway showed more cinematic camera movement and realistic human motion. However, Runway’s videos often get brighter towards the end.
When animating a ship image, Pika did well with wave and ship movements, while Runway’s waves were more static. Runway’s videos are also longer (4 seconds compared to Pika’s 3 seconds).
Runway allows extending video length up to 16 seconds. However, extended videos often change color palette and distort reference images. This warping behavior is less common in Pika AI.
Testing an image with lightning, Pika animated the lightning decently, while Runway’s animation deviated from the original image.
In terms of creativity, Pika AI seems more flexible. For example, it could animate a bear walking in a video, which Runway couldn’t.
When animating human motion, Runway excels. It shows quality animations without disfiguring limbs, unlike Pika. However, Runway is less adventurous and avoids animating unless certain of good results.
For close-up animations of human heads, Pika shows decent facial motions. Runway has better head movement but sometimes changes facial structures significantly.
Both platforms offer similar camera motion options, but Runway’s shots are more dynamic. Pika’s motions are straightforward but accurate.
Runway occasionally censors videos, which might be a limitation for some content.
Camera motion
Camera motions can be combined in Runway, offering more flexibility than Pika.
In terms of pricing, Runway’s subscription is $15 per month for about 2 minutes of video. Additional costs may apply for more credits.
Overall, Pika AI is a more creative and flexible AI video generator and is free. Runway AI has better cinematic and dynamic human movement but is prone to distortion and warping. For more content, check out beginner tutorials on animating videos using Pika AI.
Read related articles: